Case study underpinning

Their plan was to completely renovate and modernize the historic structure. A third party structural evaluation of the building revealed substantial settlement of the structure's foundation.

Case study underpinning

Overview[ edit ] In the scientific methodan experiment is an empirical procedure that arbitrates competing models or hypotheses. However, an experiment may also aim to answer a "what-if" question, without a specific expectation about what the experiment reveals, or to confirm prior results.

If an experiment is carefully conducted, the results usually either support or disprove the hypothesis. According to some philosophies of sciencean experiment can never "prove" a hypothesis, it can only add support. On the other hand, an experiment that provides a counterexample can disprove a theory or hypothesis, but a theory can always Case study underpinning salvaged by appropriate ad hoc modifications at the expense of simplicity.

An experiment must also control the possible confounding factors —any factors that would mar the accuracy or repeatability of the experiment or the ability to interpret the results.

In engineering and the physical sciences, experiments are a primary component of the scientific method. They are used to test theories and hypotheses about how physical processes work under particular conditions e. Typically, experiments in these fields focus on replication of identical procedures in hopes of producing identical results in each replication.

Random assignment is uncommon. In medicine and the social sciencesthe prevalence of experimental research varies widely across disciplines. When used, however, experiments typically follow the form of the clinical trialwhere experimental units usually individual human beings are randomly assigned to a treatment or control condition where one or more outcomes are assessed.

There are various differences in experimental practice in each of the branches of science. For example, agricultural research frequently uses randomized experiments e.

Case study underpinning

History of experiments One of the first methodical approaches to experiments in the modern Case study underpinning is visible in the works of the arab mathematician and scholar Ibn al-Haytham.

He conducted his experiments in the field of optics - going back to optical and mathematical problems in the works of Ptolemy - by controlling his experiments due to factors such as self-criticality, reliance on visible results of the experiments as well as a criticality in terms of earlier results.

We should distinguish the properties of particulars, and gather by induction what pertains to the eye when vision takes place and what is found in the manner of sensation to be uniform, unchanging, manifest and not subject to doubt.

After which we should ascend in our inquiry and reasonings, gradually and orderly, criticizing premisses and exercising caution in regard to conclusions — our aim in all that we make subject to inspection and review being to employ justice, not to follow prejudice, and to take care in all that we judge and criticize that we seek the truth and not to be swayed by opinion.

We may in this way eventually come to the truth that gratifies the heart and gradually and carefully reach the end at which certainty appears; while through criticism and caution we may seize the truth that dispels disagreement and resolves doubtful matters.

For all that, we are not free from that human turbidity which is in the nature of man; but we must do our best with what we possess of human power.

From God we derive support in all things. Furthermore, a critical view on the results and outcomes of earlier scholars is necessary: He should also suspect himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency.

In this process of critical consideration, the man himself should not forget that he tends to subjective opinions - through "prejudices" and "leniency" - and thus has to be critical about his own way of building hypotheses. Francis Bacon —an English philosopher and scientist active in the 17th century, became an influential supporter of experimental science in the english renaissance.

He disagreed with the method of answering scientific questions by deduction - similar to Ibn al-Haytham - and described it as follows: Notably, he first ordered the scientific method as we understand it today.

There remains simple experience; which, if taken as it comes, is called accident, if sought for, experiment. The true method of experience first lights the candle [hypothesis], and then by means of the candle shows the way [arranges and delimits the experiment]; commencing as it does with experience duly ordered and digested, not bungling or erratic, and from it deducing axioms [theories], and from established axioms again new experiments.

For example, Galileo Galilei accurately measured time and experimented to make accurate measurements and conclusions about the speed of a falling body.

Hanson Construction and Building Materials

Antoine Lavoisiera French chemist, used experiment to describe new areas, such as combustion and biochemistry and to develop the theory of conservation of mass matter. A considerable amount of progress on the design and analysis of experiments occurred in the early 20th century, with contributions from statisticians such as Ronald FisherJerzy NeymanOscar KempthorneGertrude Mary Coxand William Gemmell Cochranamong others.

Types of experiment[ edit ] Experiments might be categorized according to a number of dimensions, depending upon professional norms and standards in different fields of study.

In some disciplines e.E1 focuses on the structuring of organisations. It covers the structure and principles of underpinning the operational functions of the organisation, their efficient management and effective interaction in enabling the organisation to achieve its strategic objective.

Underpinning and Excavation Support at Industrial Facility - Helical Drilling

The Challenge & Solution: The site is an old drainage course with weathered rock bearing strata overlain by an undocumented fill of sands and boulders varying in thickness from 0 to 40 feet. Qualys customer best practice videos, success stories / case studies, and testimonials.

An experiment is a procedure carried out to support, refute, or validate a rutadeltambor.comments provide insight into cause-and-effect by demonstrating what outcome occurs when a particular factor is manipulated. Experiments vary greatly in goal and scale, but always rely on repeatable procedure and logical analysis of the results.

RCC WATERPROOFING Case Study: Underpinning and Basement Lowering. July 13, RCC Waterproofing Preparation: The basement is dug out, maintaining an angle of repose where the dirt is cut on an angle. This is done so the wall still has.

A polygraph, popularly referred to as a lie detector, measures and records several physiological indices such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while a person is asked and answers a series of questions.

The belief underpinning the use of the polygraph is that deceptive answers will produce physiological responses that can be differentiated from those associated with.

Polygraph - Wikipedia